|
George Carver's First Knife (Saturday, 7 March 1992) As a
postscript to the above story, and a further confirmation of a cooperative
universe, Lauren recently asked Joyce to read her some more about George
Washington Carver. Joyce is initially reluctant. Last fall we had read two
long biographies of Carver and Joyce wants to turn to someone else.
But Lauren pleads for more Carver. So I prowl through a packet of
materials that Tuskegee University had sent us and come across The Man
Who Talks With the Flowers, by Glenn Clark. So Joyce surrenders and
starts reading pieces of it to Lauren. Almost immediately they come upon
the following story, which I'll share in full. Clark is questioning
Carver.
"Could you describe to us your methods when you meet a
problem?"
"I never grope for methods. The method is revealed the moment I am
inspired to create something new. I live in the woods. I gather specimens
and listen to what God has to say to me. After my morning's talk with God
I go into my laboratory and begin to carry out His wishes for the
day."
"Can you recall your first answer to prayer?" I asked.
"One of my most surprising answers to prayer came when I was a
little boy of five or six. I had no pocket knife, and how I longed for
one! I was very mechanical-minded. And of all things--a boy without a
pocket knife!
"So one night I prayed to the Father to send me a knife, and that
night I had a dream. I dreamed that out in the field where the corn rows
joined the tobacco rows there was a watermelon cut in halves. One half was
all gouged out. The other half, plump and full, was leaning up against
three stalks of corn, and out of it stuck the black handle of a pocket
knife.
"The next morning I could hardly wait till I got through breakfast
before I scampered out to the cornfield. There where the corn rows joined
the tobacco rows I saw a watermelon cut in halves, one half was all gouged
out and the other half, plump and solid, rested up against three stalks of
corn. And sticking out of it was the black handle of a pocket
knife."
Lauren, of course, is enthralled by the story, relating to it directly
and empathically. None of us had heard it before; the other two books
hadn't mentioned it. Directly following this story is another question for
Carver.
"You have the habit of talking to a little flower or a peanut and
making it give up its secrets to you. How do you do it?"
Carver's response is profound:
"You have to love it enough," said Dr. Carver. "Anything
will give up its secrets if you love it enough. Not only have I found that
when I talk to the little flower or to the little peanut they will give up
their secrets," he continued as if talking to himself, "but I
have found that when I silently commune with people they give up their
secrets also--if you love them enough."
Re-Tracing Our Gender Lines (Tuesday, 17 March 1992) Today, on
Joyce’s birthday, I’m wanting to trace back Lauren's gender lines.
Genealogy can quickly become labyrinthine. It also has a strong
patriarchal bias. Perhaps a less complex and less sexist approach might be
to delineate someone's mother-line and father-line. Lauren's father is
Robert. Robert's father is Caleb. Caleb's father is Henry Wilder. And so
on. This is a fairly easy line to trace. It goes back twelve generations
to Pasco, who arrived on the shores of Salem, Massachusetts from England
in the early 1600s.
Lauren’s mother-line, however, is less easy. Lauren's mother is
Joyce. Joyce's mother is Lilly. Lilly's mother is Dana. Dana's mother is
Melly. And there the trail (at least for me, for now) grows cold.
These mother-lines are fascinating, precisely because they're so
obscure. In our patrilineal culture, a girl takes her father's name and a
woman takes her husband's. Women don't have surnames, only given names.
Slaves, too, had no surnames. George Washington Carver, for example, took
the surname of the family which owned him.
Neither slaves nor women have their own names. Women have maiden names
and married names, but both are men's names. What does it mean for a woman
not to have her own name? How does being nameless lodge in a woman's
psyche? How does it affect her sense of identity and continuity, her
connections with the past?
It feels important to offer to Lauren (and to other girl-children)
whatever slender threads of a mother-line that we're able to spin out of the
scanty records that we have or can find.
Can I Do It For a Million Dollars? (Saturday, 21 March 1992)
Lofty is telling Joyce what she would do if she had a million dollars.
"I'd buy a horse. And a saddle and bridle and everything. And I'd
buy the materials and have someone build me a barn. And then I'd buy all
the fencing to fence in the pasture. And enough hay for the horse to eat
in the winter."
She pauses and looks at Joyce inquiringly.
"Do you think I can do it for a million dollars??"
Cold Lava (Saturday, 21 March 1992) Another of those peculiar
synchronicities today. Lauren awakens with a dream about ice-cold lava
flowing slowly across a highway. Then this afternoon she receives a
postcard from her aunt Heather, who is visiting her uncle David and Karin
in Hawaii. The picture on the card shows molten lava from one of Hawaii’s
volcanic eruptions. The lava is flowing across a coastal highway. Lauren
is startled to see the card. It's the first time that she has either
dreamt about or received a postcard about lava.
Bedtime Story (Friday, 3 April 1992) Lauren's riding another
wave of reading enthusiasm. After we finish the evening ritual of reading
our bedtime story, and Joyce and Lauren climb into bed, Lauren reads aloud
from one of her books. Currently we're being treated to several
pages nightly from The Cat in the Hat.
Won't It Be Wonderful (Wednesday, 8 April 1992) We awake to a
beautiful spring day. Lofty and I walk out of the house and up toward the
shelter. We’re on our way to pick up my mother, Hope, at the airport.
Lofty takes several deep breaths, drinking in the aroma of the earth. Then
she says, "Won't it be wonderful that Hopie will be able to
come here and smell this smell?!"
The Bomb in the News Station (Wednesday, 8 April 1992) Lauren
has a dream about being at Blue Mountain (a local alternative school) with
a bunch of kids. She’s having a good time playing with them. Somehow,
though, there’s a news station attached to the school, with a bomb in it
that’s about to go off.
George Washington Carver's Way (Saturday, 18 April 1992)
Tomorrow we're celebrating Lauren's eighth birthday, combining it with an
Easter egg hunt and Sunday morning pancakes. We’re expecting a big
crowd. Fortunately, the weather forecast is favorable. We'd have to move
into crisis mode if all those kids and their parents had to somehow cram
into our small community shelter.
Lauren’s helping Joyce dye Easter eggs, using various natural
ingredients that Joyce has learned over the years will produce all those
softy, lovely earth colors. Toward the end of the process, Lauren wants to
try a dying experiment of her own. So she gathers some grass and onion
skins and various other substances, mixes them together, and adds an egg
to the mixture.
Nothing happens, except the faintest tinge of some drab color.
Disappointed, Lauren asks, "Won't my experiments ever
work?"
"Well, you can learn everything I've learned," Joyce replies,
"and then you can study all the different books to see what other
people have learned. Or," she adds after a pause, "you can try
George Washington Carver's way."
Lauren, of course, rises to the bait.
"What way is that?"
"You can ask God to help you figure out what experiments to try.
Then you can be quiet and listen."
A long silence ensues as Lauren mulls over this unorthodox option.
Doing What You Like to Do (Saturday, 18 April 1992) After Lauren
finishes dying the Easter eggs she comes down to the house to help me
figure out what games to play during her party. It’s mid-afternoon. I am
experiencing my usual mid-afternoon energy slump and am moving toward my
usual brief-but-sweet mid-afternoon nap.
Lauren reads my mood instantly. After we've decided on a few games, she
asks me, out of the blue, "What do you like to do?"
The question startles me, not only because it’s out of context, but
also because it seems like an "important" question. My body can
feel the importance of the question, as though its one that we should
be asking ourselves and each other more often.
So I share several things that I like to do.
She nods, and then asks, "What else do you like to
do?"
I pause, reassess, and add several more items to my list.
She nods again. Waits a while. Then says, "What would you most
like to do, right now?"
Without thinking, I reply, "I'd most like to take a nap."
"Well, that's just what you should do. You should do just what
you'd most like to do, no matter what it is, because that's the best way
to get your energy back."
I bow silently to my teacher and follow her advice.
|